Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

DARWIN AWARDS FOR ATTORNEYS

In the grand tradition of the Darwin Awards comes Carolyn Elefant's latest post. In "What's Worse -- A Lying Lawyer or A Stupid, Greedy One?," Elefant tells the story of an attorney who's being disciplined for duping two colleagues into joining a fictitious law firm.

Elefant, as she is wont to do, does a little ex post facto reading-between-the-lines for the two colleagues -- and, happily for this reader, she doesn't hold back:

"Here's my real beef.  If dishonesty, outside the context of an attorney-client relationship is grounds for disbarment, why isn't greed and incompetence?  After all, what were those lawyers who left their jobs thinking when a former public defender claimed to have $5.2 million to start a firm?  Did those lawyers think it was a wise business move to work for an attorney who offered to buy them BMWs rather than reinvesting the money back in the firm?  Did the lawyers ask whether Sutherin had a business plan for further growth of the firm or office space or even a Web site? Were they at all concerned that a former public defender, who I'm assuming had no previous experience running a law firm, would be capable of launching a practice that would succeed from the start? Did they try to negotiate some kind of written employment agreement? At best, the duped attorneys were guilty of simple incompetence in failing to protect their own interests and at worst, of allowing the lure of fancy cars and high salaries to obscure their good judgment.  Surely, we don't want that kind of attorney in practice any more than a dishonest one.  So why weren't those attorneys subject to discipline also?"

More here.

Posted by Jennifer Moline on February 28, 2005 at 11:21 AM | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/198502/1921586

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference DARWIN AWARDS FOR ATTORNEYS:

 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions