About The Bloggers
Adam Smith, Esq. ALM Research Blog The Am Law Daily Blawg Review The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times The Common Scold Counsel to Counsel The Daily Report's Deal Watch EDD Update The Estrin Report FutureLawyer How Appealing Human Law InhouseBlog Insurance Scrawl I/P Updates JD Bliss Jottings by an Employer's Lawyer LA Legal Pad Law DepartmentManagement Larry Bodine LawMarketing Blog Leadership for Lawyers Legal Pad legal sanity Legal Technology Blog May It Please The Court My Shingle New York Personal Injury Law Blog The Prior Art Robert Ambrogi'sLawSites The Shark Silicon Valley MediaLaw Blog Tex Parte Wired GC
Volokh Conspiracy Wall Street Journal Law Blog Professor Bainbridge Ernie the Attorney SCOTUSblog Althouse Dennis Kennedy Bag and Baggage Patently-O Patent Baristas PrawfsBlawg
Porn Star, Hooker, Law Student Boston Libel Judge Resigns From Bench Is Law Review Selection Biased -- Or Do Fewer Women Submit? WhoCanISue Needs to Learn HowCanIAdvertise Do Good Lawyers Just Sit on the Sidelines? Are Women Their Own Worst Enemies in the Workforce? The High Cost of a Protest Corporate America's 'A' Team Former Lawyer Convicted in Art Case 'First Amendment Guerrilla' Jack Landau Dies
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Email Me
Powered by TypePad
« Volokh Conspirators lambaste NYT piece on "Constitution in exile" | Main | Beyond the buzz: Knowledge Management »
"No 'Constitution in exile'?" Pattis disagrees with Volokh Conspirators
"Are the guys over at the Volokh Conspiracy smoking something?" asks Norm Pattis, Crime & Federalism blogger, in response to the Volokh Conspirators' posts debunking Jeffrey Rosen's Sunday NYT article. (For a menu of VC writing on the subject, see my post Volokh Conspirators lambaste NYT piece on "Constitution in exile.")
Pattis writes, "Why deny the obvious? Cultural conservatives have a whole lot of court-packin' going on." Thus far, his readers seem to agree. More here.
Posted by Jennifer Moline on April 19, 2005 at 10:20 AM | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/198502/2276448
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "No 'Constitution in exile'?" Pattis disagrees with Volokh Conspirators: