Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

What's in a name for "solos"?

Carolyn Elefant ponders a question from The Greatest American Lawyer:  "What should we call practitioners who are not in a partnership-based law firm, if not solo practitioners?" Elefant gently disagrees with his premise that "solo" has negative connotations but her readers have a much stronger response.

Reader Dave writes, "Do what you want and who cares what anyone else thinks?? In the corporate world, solo might not have as good of a connotation, but if he's happy and his client's happy, who cares?"

What do you think and what do you call yourself? Elefant's open to comments here.

 

Posted by Jennifer Moline on April 13, 2005 at 10:55 AM | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/198502/2244043

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What's in a name for "solos"? :

 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions