Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

The Enron Case: A Verdict for the Attorneys

Yesterday afternoon,  Legal Blog Watch  delivered the late-breaking news on the Enron Verdict. Today,  Howard Bashman offers a vast collection of articles analyzing the verdict.   Everyone's got a spin on the verdict, asking (like Daniel Gross in Slate) whether corporate America will really learn from Enron to an opinion from Bench Conference that Enron shows why defendants should not testify on their behalf.   What's not been covered, however, is whether Enron was a victory for Daniel Petrocelli and Michael Ramsey, who represented Skilling and Lay.

Though  Skilling  lost,  Petrocelli won big.  For Petrocelli and his firm, Enron was a gamble in the sense that it represented an attempt for Petrocelli and his firm, O'Melveny & Myers to transition from big civil work to big criminal work.  Consequently, the firm was willing to take a soaking on fees.  And looks like it's paid off, as shown by this endorsement from one juror, reported in this BusinessWeek article:

"Jurors said they believed attorney Petrocelli did a good job defending Skilling, despite the loss. 'I'd hire him,' said one. 'If you had the money,' another added."

As for Ramsey, results are more mixed.  Some experts questioned the Lay defense team's decision to plow ahead even in the face of Ramsey's leave of absence midtrial due to medical conditions.  But at least one juror quoted in this Law.com article didn't think it would have made a difference, explaining:

"Ramsey is a great lawyer. But I'm not sure that the Lord himself could have turned these facts around. A Mack truck coming at you at 100 miles an hour is a hard thing to stop."

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on May 26, 2006 at 11:26 AM | Permalink | Comments (1)

Comments

So what have we learned from Enron? The business world and regulators are patting themselves on the back and telling us it’s ok to invest in stocks again because the bad guys have been punished. But Refco, Fannie Mae, and the backdating of options tell us that the bugs are still in the system. A few years of Sarbanes-0xley is not going to save us from another Enron. Read more at:
http://www.soxfirst.com/50226711/what_have_we_learned_from_enron.php

Posted by: Sox First | May 26, 2006 1:12:43 PM

Post a comment






 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions