Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

Lawyers Are Unhappy Because It's Our Nature to Cooperate, Not Litigate

Victoria Pynchon of Settle It Now offers an interesting theory on why lawyers are unhappy. Pynchon explains that recent MRI images of students' brains during a collaborative process shows that the act of cooperating with others "makes the brain light up with joy." So when lawyers operate in adversarial situations, as most litigators do, they're acting against against our natural, cooperative instinct. 

Pynchon asks:

What does this mean for hard working litigators? That a creative settlement providing the greatest benefit for the greatest number will not only be good for our clients, it will make all of us, attorney and client alike, lots lots happier. And happy clients are the clients we retain.And as for all that competitive energy? It's still a necessary component of getting your adversary to cooperate.

Pynchon's theory is interesting, but I'm not convinced that formerly adversarial attorneys feel much happier when they're working towards a settlement. Many times, settlement talks are contaminated by distrust and a lawyer's own second guessing (does he really mean that the $50,000 is his bottom line, or is he just saying that -- can I get more?) that create even more stress, which can also breed unhappiness. It seems to me that collaboration brings the kind of joy that Pynchon describes only in situations where lawyers haven't already muddied the relationship with adversarial conflict. 

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on November 30, 2006 at 01:07 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)

Comments

"Contamination by distrust' is the precise artifact of litigation this study addresses.

COLLABORATION is cooperation freed (the the extent we lawyers DARE trust!) of the old rules of warfare-- mistrust and gamesmanship.

I assure you is is FAR healthier for all concerned.

and it WILL become the norm for family law, and acceoted eventually in civil law. because it works for everyone, and it's not toxic. You can quote me!

Posted by: Carroll Straus | Dec 1, 2006 9:29:53 AM

Post a comment






 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions