Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

Should Women Lawyers Stage Job Action?

After our post yesterday about the MIT Workplace Center report, Women Lawyers and Obstacles to Leadership, reaction continued to come in from around the blogosphere. Among the responses were two somewhat radical ideas for addressing the female partnership problem.

The first came from Bruce MacEwen at Adam Smith, Esq. Addressing the inherent conflict between women's roles as mothers and as potential partners, his self-described radical suggestion is to "decouple" a women's prime child-bearing years from her prime partnership-track years. His idea is that firms would allow women to take off from the firm for as long as seven or eight years to start their families. When these women return to the firm, "they would jump right back on the partnership track ladder." He adds:

"Those who return will be highly motivated, and they will also have gained a level of maturity and picked up skills that will be of genuine value to the firm and its clients."

Meanwhile, via Stephen Seckler at Counsel to Counsel comes what is, perhaps, an even more radical suggestion than MacEwen's. Seckler attended Wednesday's Boston reception presenting the MIT report. Later, he received an e-mail from another attendee, Sheila Statlender, a clinical psychologist in Newton, Mass., who sits with Seckler on the Boston Bar Association's Standing Committee on Work/Life Balance. Statlender's e-mail conveyed a number of her "musings" about the report, then concluded with this idea:

"I fantasized about a walk out of female attorneys, hopefully accompanied by their male supporters -- perhaps only an hour or two in length, to protest current conditions and to express support for the ideas/strategies proposed at yesterday's briefing. Or an all day conference, a sort of pre-planned walkout, filled with workshops on getting better assignments, business development, the work-life continuum, ... self-care, etc. -- not held on the weekend, but pointedly during the workday."

Women lawyers of the world, unite? Why not? Imagine the impact if women lawyers throughout the United States walked off their jobs for a single, organized day of workshops and events. Even better, imagine if their male supporters joined them. Would the business of law grind to a halt? You bet it would. Would progress be made? No doubt.

Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on May 4, 2007 at 02:32 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Comments

Post a comment






 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions