Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

Court Protects Blogger's Anonymity

The The New York Law Journal reports today that a New York court has refused a petitioner's request to force Google to reveal the identity of an anonymous blogger. The petitioner, Pamela Greenbaum, a school board member in Lawrence, N.Y., brought a pre-action discovery proceeding seeking to force Google to disclose the author of the blog Orthomom, which Google hosts on its Blogger service. The blog, which covers local issues in the Lawrence area as well as issues relating to Orthodox Judaism, criticized Greenbaum for her opposition to the use of public-school funds for private-school students. In one post alleged to be defamatory, the blogger wrote, "Way [for Greenbaum] to make it clear that you have no interest in helping the private school community."

In a decision issued Oct. 23, Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Marcy Friedman concluded that Greenbaum had not shown that she has a meritorious claim for defamation and therefore is not entitled to disclosure of the blogger's identity. Friedman wrote:

[T]he court ... finds that Orthomom's statements are not reasonably susceptible of a defamatory connotation. Greenbaum's defamation claim against Orthomom reduces to the insupportable assertion that Orthomom implied that Greenbaum is an anti-semite merely because Orthomom disagreed with Greenbaum's position on the use of public funding for a program that could have affected the Orthodox Jewish community.

Because the blogger was expressing her opinion about a fact that was not in dispute, her statement was protected by the First Amendment, the judge said.

One of Orthomom's lawyers, Paul Alan Levy of the Washington, D.C.-based Public Citizen Litigation Group, told the New York Law Journal: "It's clear that the judge in this case relied on the evidence before her. A person doesn't get to identify the alleged wrongdoer without some evidence [of wrongdoing]."

Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on November 13, 2007 at 12:07 PM | Permalink | Comments (3)

Comments

Well thank goodness for that!

Posted by: | Nov 14, 2007 10:44:04 AM

I know, its you only.... great.. 1st & 6th amendment pep in for awesome assistance sometimes

Posted by: | Nov 14, 2007 12:07:49 PM

The judge made the correct ruling for sure. Bloggers that write about sensitive topics need all of the 1st Amendment protections they can get. Only with the freedom to write without fear of unreasonable retaliation can we keep the honest flow of information going in the public forum.

The subject matter (contract attorney work) I write about does catch some flack sometimes. But it's nothing compared to the reactions against one of the other more well known sites though.

Posted by: My Attorney Blog | Nov 14, 2007 12:13:57 PM

Post a comment






 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions