Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

Florida Suit Challenges Lawyer Advertising Rules

Jacksonville, Fla., lawyer Bill Harrell of the firm Harrell & Harrell did what state ethics rules required him to do. In 2002, he sought and received state bar approval to use the advertising slogan, "Don't settle for less than you deserve." On the strength of that, he used the slogan in extensive television and phone book advertising. His firm is reported to be one of the largest personal injury practices in Northeast Florida. Last year, he made "minor design changes" to his advertising campaign but stuck with the same slogan. When he submitted the redesigned ads to the bar for approval, the bar rejected them. Twice more he submitted the ads and twice more the bar said no.

Earlier this week, Harrell's firm joined with the consumer rights group Public Citizen to sue the Florida bar, as reported by The Florida Times-Union. The suit claims that the state's rules governing lawyer advertising violate free speech by preventing lawyers from presenting factual information about their services. "Before people should be able to tell you what you can and cannot say, there should be a reason for it and the reason should be clear," Harrell told the Times-Union. "None of that has occurred here." A statement issued by Public Citizen described Florida's rules as "among the most restrictive in the country, prohibiting slogans, descriptions of quality, background noises, and other common advertising techniques." Public Citizen has set up a Web page to house pleadings in the case, which has a copy of the complaint filed Monday in Florida's Middle District federal court.

Elizabeth Tarbert, ethics counsel for the Bar, declined to comment on the specifics of the lawsuit, according to the Times-Union, but said that the rule under which Harrell's phrase was rejected was designed to prevent subjective statements that cannot be factually substantiated. "The example I like to give is that you can't say that you offer high quality legal services or that you're great or the best lawyer," she said.

[Hat tip to ABA Journal.]

Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on January 10, 2008 at 11:38 AM | Permalink | Comments (2)

Comments

I wonder how the Bar would react to sarcastic or ironic attorney slogans, like "John Badd, Attorney at Law: With a Name Like Badd, You Have to be Good." Or how about, "We stink, don't use us. (Smile)" Something tells me these wouldn't fly, either. Regulators are not a humor-loving lot.

Posted by: Larry Rogak | Jan 10, 2008 3:47:17 PM

linked your article, thanks.

Posted by: johnny utah | May 7, 2008 9:47:39 PM

Post a comment






 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions