Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

Tracking Lawyers' Reactions to Unmasking of Troll Tracker

Up until February, no one knew that Rick Frenkel, an in-house lawyer at Cisco by day, was also the anonymous blogger behind the controversial Patent Troll Tracker site, where he regularly outed companies (and their lawyers) that he considered to be patent trolls -- a pejorative term for one who enforces his or her patents against alleged infringers in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunistic.  As my colleague Bob Ambrogi reported here, Frenkel voluntarily unmasked himself after Chicago plaintiffs' lawyer Raymond P. Niro offered a $15,000 reward to  anyone who could reveal Frenkel's identity.   

Frenkel's unmasking has triggered diametrically opposed reactions from lawyers in the patent bar. 
As reported in the Daily Journal, two Texas patent lawyers, T. John Ward Jr. and Eric Albritton are suing both Frenkel and his deep-pocketed employer, Cisco for defamation.  Ward and Britton claim that Frenkel's blog falsely accused them of altering the date of a patent infringement complaint so that it would not be filed before their client's patent had been approved.  They also argue that Cisco is vicariously liable for the comments because Frenkel allegedly operated "with the full knowledge and [...] consent of his employer."  By the way, if you're interested in the specific blog posts that launched these lawsuits, Joe Mullin shares his best guess at The Prior Art.

In contrast to Ward and Albritton, who take offense at the term "patent trolls," at least one law firm has gone on the offensive against so-called trolls.  National law firm Howrey recently created a new brochure for clients that makes the firm's stance on trolls clear:  Howrey won't represent them, and criticizes firms that do.

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on March 11, 2008 at 12:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)

Comments

Paul Bedard at US News and World Report has an interesting story on patent trolls this week: http://www.usnews.com/blogs/news-desk/2008/03/07/gop-steps-up-moves-against-lawyers.html.

Posted by: Derek Baker | Mar 13, 2008 2:33:48 PM

Post a comment






 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions