Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

More Non-Equity Partners = Lower PPP

When The American Lawyer released its Am Law 100 report last week, many noticed a correlation between increased PPP (profits per partner) on the one hand and the decline in the number of equity partners and growth in the category of non-equity partners on the other.  This correlation might lead some to assume that law firms with a higher percentage of non-equity partners will have larger PPP's, because there are fewer partners taking a piece of the profit pie.

But as Bruce MacEwen convincingly argues, the truth is that firms with a larger percentage of non-equity partners have lower PPPs overall.  The reason?  As MacEwen describes:

As it turns out, what comes with introducing a non-equity tier is a subtly changed dynamic in the incentive set facing your talent.  Firms with a single-tier partnership attract the true Type A's:  Those of us who have never finished anywhere but at the top of a class and have no intention of starting to do otherwise.  But the two-tier firms hold out a veiled alternative:  If you keep your nose clean and work (reasonably but not insanely) hard, you might find yourself taking home (say)  $400,000 per year, adjusted for inflation, for the duration.   And you won't have to kill yourself in either billable hours or business generation.

As MacEwen explains further, non-equity partners cost the most and are also less productive than either partners or associates. 

Sure, there are reasons to establish non-equity partnership tracks -- perhaps to hold on to specific individuals or to facilitate work-life balance.  But increasing revenues and boosting profitability isn't one of them.

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on May 8, 2008 at 12:05 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Comments

Post a comment






 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions