Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

Sex, Drugs and Lawsuits at Boston Law Firm

This story about an associate who claims that her law firm failed to investigate her complaint that she had been drugged at a firm holiday party, and that another associate had been drugged and raped, seems like a plot out of a TV show like Boston Legal -- but unfortunately, it's not. 

According to the article, yesterday, the associate, Michelle Moor, filed a discrimination complaint at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, asserting that the firm did not take her allegations seriously. The complaint describes that Moor had two glasses of wine at the firm holiday party.  Later, feeling ill, she went to an emergency room, where a blood test revealed she had ingested Tegretol, an antiseizure medication that can cause memory loss when mixed with alcohol.  When Moor later told a more senior associate about the incident, the other associate confided that she had been raped by a Bingham employee the year before and reported the incident to the police.  She did not, however, tell the firm, for fear of not being promoted.  Subsequently, Moor reported both incidents to the firm's human resources officer, who said that the firm would investigate.  Later, Moor overhead a discussion where a Bingham employee revealed that he enjoyed having sex with women who were unconscious and that he knew where to get date-rape drugs.  Moor brought this information to the human resources office as well.  Eventually, Moor left the firm over concerns for her safety -- and thereafter, the firm issued a notice to employees about the drugging incident.

If Bingham were representing a company where an employee reported the type of conduct that Moor did, I'm certain that they'd advise their client to undertake a full investigation of the incident, collect statements and take remedial action if necessary.   Likewise, I'm guessing that Paul Hastings would have advised its clients not to act so insensitively in terminating a potentially protected employee.  Why don't law firms take the same advice that they'd render to their clients?

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on May 8, 2008 at 12:29 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Comments

Post a comment






 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions