Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Professor Bainbridge
Ernie the Attorney
SCOTUSblog
Althouse
Dennis Kennedy
Bag and Baggage
Patently-O
Patent Baristas
PrawfsBlawg

Recent Posts

Categories

LegalTech New York 2008



Archive

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004



 

What Do Clients Really Think About Outsourcing to India?

I've posted previously, here and here about some of the concerns that law firms have raised about offshoring legal work to India.  But truthfully, who cares what the lawyers think about offshoring?  After all, they're not paying the bills.  By contrast, we rarely hear about legal outsourcing from the perspective of corporate clients who actually use these services.

Until now.  At Prism Legal, Ron Friedmann summarizes a presentation by Connie Brenton, Assistant General Counsel for Sun Microsystems, on the company's experience with outsourcing.  Brenton described that Sun began to explore the LPO (legal processs outsourcing) option in 2005 to reduce its legal costs. Unfortunately, the company's offshoring efforts had a rocky beginning with a contract review project in 2006.  However, the second project fared better because Sun required much more training and process guidance, even providing its own project manager and contract templates. 

Bottom line:  Sun enjoyed substantial savings and continues to use LPOs. 

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on July 17, 2008 at 08:19 AM | Permalink | Comments (3)

Comments

That's the best thing to do for many companies, to use LPO, who wants to outsource outside the country. Legal matters are really effective, especially in business.

Posted by: Customer Care Representative | Jul 17, 2008 9:02:08 PM

Its just the matter of being more efficient in the transitional competitive platform. Sincerely, with all the advent of sophsticated technology, the time has come to consider Global Resources as one and the person who uses them effectively, is certainly have the edge.

Moreover, I believe LPO's is a blessing for the growing small businesses, we ourself have assisted growing companies to cut more then 50% on their legal expenditure.

Thank you,

Avish
www.ProdigyLegal.com
Blog: www.prodigy-legal.blogspot.com

Posted by: Avish | Jul 18, 2008 2:24:03 AM

I'm a service provider, not a client so I guess I am biased. It certainly doesn't surprise me that base cost, rather than value, is as usual the main factor in the equation. But if you look at the two comments above mine you will see poor grammar and poorly communicated statements. If it's hard to create a clear comment, it is likely to be much harder to craft a well-written document when there are language differences.

Posted by: Laurie | Jul 18, 2008 8:41:42 PM

Post a comment






 
 
 
About ALM | About law.com | Customer Support
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions