« Justice Kennedy: American criminal sentences are too long |
Main
| Lit Support Guy: Do shareholders realize that Morgan Stanley "kicked Kirkland under a bus" »
"Have blogs improved Law.com?"
One of the questions Mike Cernovich raises today is whether or not blogs have improved Law.com. He writes,
"A year or so ago, I rarely checked law.com's page, since I wasn't impressed with its coverage. No offense, law.com folks, but law.com often read like People magazine for lawyers. Lately, I've noticed good changes.
"Over the past few months, law.com has been especially useful and informative. There have been stories dicussing actual legal doctrine, and less stories dealing with how cool AmLaw 100 law firms are. Which makes me wonder.
"Has law.com improved because its editors and writers have been reading blogs? I'm not privy to any information, but I note that there have been several articles that seemed like they were adapted from blog posts. If writers have been inspired by blogs, then this shows the powerful alliance blogs and media outlets should make ..."
What do you think? He's open to comments here.
Posted by Product Team on May 18, 2005 at 02:16 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cce2453ef00d83546991769e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Have blogs improved Law.com?":