Law.com Blog Network

About The Bloggers

Blogroll

Breaking Down the Legal Case Against the @BPGlobalPR Twitter Feed

One of the side-stories emerging from the BP oil spill disaster has been the popular (and fake) BP Twitter feed @BPGlobalPR. If you haven't been following along, here is a sampling of what has been coming out of @BPGlobalPR since the trouble began:

If we're being accused of being criminals, we want to be tried by a jury of our peers- wealthy execs who don't give a damn. #fairisfairless than a minute ago via Twitterrific

I've gotta say, at night the gulf really doesn't look that bad. #bpcaresless than a minute ago via Twitterrific

We've created something that will affect your children's children. Can YOU say the same about YOUR life? #nailedit #bpcaresless than a minute ago via Twitterrific


And so on. Perhaps it was inevitable that the real BP public relations folks would be annoyed and upset by @BPGlobalPR, but there is no indication thus far that they have tried to actually shut the satirical feed down. The Twittersphere has already anticipated this move, of course, and counter-attacked in advance:

BP wants Twitter to shut down a fake account mocking the oil company. Twitter wants BP to shut down the oil leak that’s ruining the ocean.less than a minute ago via Twitter for iPhone

Over at the Spam Notes blog, Venkat Balasubramani takes a look at some of the legal issues surrounding the fake BP feed, specifically whether using the @BPGlobalPR name constitutes "user name/trade name hijacking, protectible fair use, or both?"

Some of Venkat's thoughts:

1. Dilution/Tarnishment:  BP's strongest cause of action may be for dilution/tarnishment, rather than garden variety infringement, because BPGlobalPR isn't selling any goods or services that are competitive with BP. 

2. Cybersquatting:  Use of a mark in a Twitter account handle doesn't get you much as far as UDRP or the ACPA.  (See "No UDRP Relief for Post-Domain Use of Trademark")

3. Claims Against Twitter: "Claims against Twitter by BP would be ill-advised."

4. Twitter's Designation of the Account as a Parody Account:  Twitter has guidelines for registering and using Twitter accounts for parody, commentary, and fan purposes.  (See "Parody, Commentary, and Fan Accounts Policy.")  Perhaps Twitter could "add a designation to parody/commentary accounts that lets end users know that the account in question is not an 'official account,' and is one that exists for commentary, parody, or other fair use purposes."

Read the full analysis from Spam Notes here.

Posted by Bruce Carton on June 2, 2010 at 01:14 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)

Comments

 
 
 
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions