« Question: Who Can Legally Use the Disabled-Access Toilet Stall? |
Main
| MoFo2Go iPhone App: 700-Plus Downloads and Counting »
Must Employees Suing Their Employers Be 'Disgruntled?'
Quick, fill in the blank below:
"Disgruntled __________"
Did you say "employee?" Of course you did!
At the Workplace Prof Blog, Charles Sullivan writes that he can't recall a single case where his clients, who were suing a present or former employer, were not promptly labeled "disgruntled employees" by the defendants. But the term "disgruntled" has a negative connotation, Sullivan says, that goes beyond simply describing an employee with a legal disagreement with an employer. For instance, the Oxford English Dictionary defines "disgruntled" as "sulky dissatisfaction," "ill-humour," "chagrin," and "disgust,” which are probably not terms that plaintiffs' counsel would choose to have automatically associated with their client.
Sullivan observes that the use of "disgruntled" to describe employees is creeping
beyond defense counsel's briefs and into judicial opinions. Some
courts, he says, appear to use the term generally to describe any complaint made by
an employee, and his quick legal research shows the following:
- 1004 "disgruntled employees" in Lexis' Federal
& State Cases database, as compared to 399 "dissatisfied"
employees.
- With respect to "customers" or "buyers," only 195 are disgruntled, with 593 dissatisfied.
- Almost no "disgruntled employers" (just 24).
- Zero "gruntled" employees (just kidding -- I added that one).
Posted by Bruce Carton on July 2, 2010 at 11:30 AM | Permalink
| Comments (2)